Eräitä huomioita

License distribution

Posted in Free Software by Niklas Vainio on the March 18th, 2005. Tags: , , , , ,

I decided to take a look at how much different free software licenses are used. After looking at various analyses made by other people earlier, I made my own based on Sourceforge and Freshmeat. The result:

Sourceforge Freshmeat
GPL 69.23% 67.94%
LGPL 11.17% 5.95%
BSD-like 7.16% 5.46%

I found earlier results from January 2001, April 2002, May 2002, September 2002 & November 2003 and March 2004. When compared with them, it seems that use of GPL has decreased by 3-4% while LGPL and BSD have increased a bit, but it might also be that with this sample we really cannot know if this is really the case. This comparison needs to be done again in a couple of years. Anyway, here’s the table for Sourceforge:

Jan 2001 April 2002 May 2002 Nov 2003 March 2004 March 2005
GPL 73,09% 73,00% 72,00% 71,00% 71,14% 69,23%
LGPL 9,86% 10,00% 10,00% 10,00% 10,82% 11,17%
BSD 5,65% 7,00% 7,00% 7,00% 7,13% 7,16%
Number of projects 9077 23651 39000 45736 50332 61348

You can also download the OpenOffice file, which has more details.

Howison
and Crowston
warn about dangers of using Sourceforge for
analyses like this, but I don’t think their warnings apply when just
looking at the licenses.

Update April 7, 2005: Added the number of projects in the table.

6 Responses to 'License distribution'

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  1. grex said, on April 6th, 2005 at 22:46

    Very good idea! It would be interesting to see how much 100% is for every sample. Maybe GPL has lost 3%, but the number of applications has more than doubled.

  2. Niklas Vainio said, on April 7th, 2005 at 15:15

    I added a line for total number of projects in the table. Any interesting conclusions?

  3. grex said, on April 8th, 2005 at 16:46

    No conclusions ;-), but some comments:

    The pace of new projects seems to be almost linear (I suppose it should be May 2003 not May 2002), around 10,000 projects per year.

    I would even say that the current period is not the most fruitful in that sense. This is probably due to other SF-like systems as Savannah, BerliOS and so on.

    Maybe many GNU GPL applications that may had started in SF have finally chosen Savannah, although I haven’t found stats about licenses there. I see that the proportion of GPL in the 1,700+ BerliOS projects is around 68%.

  4. Niklas Vainio said, on April 8th, 2005 at 17:53

    It really is May 2002. See above for sources.

    I wrote a script to get some more data from the Sourceforge site so we can see what happens when we only look at stable/mature projects. I’m downloading at the moment, I hope SF is okay with that…

  5. Niklas Vainio said, on April 8th, 2005 at 19:04

    Actually, I noticed SF software map has filters that can be used to obtain this information. I’ll post it later.

  6. grex said, on April 10th, 2005 at 02:09

    Niklas, have also a look at the data provided by the OSSMole project. They spider SourceForge periodically and offer publicly the data.